Is Sunak’s Comment on Women not having Penises Transphobic?

In an interview, Rishi Sunak stated that “100%” of women do not have a penis. But was his comment transphobic?

Is Sunak's Comment on Women not having Penises Transphobic f


the issue of biological sex is critical

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak recently made a statement affirming that women do not have penises, during an interview.

Rishi Sunak was responding to a question about Labour Party leader Sir Keir Starmer’s comment that 99.9% of women do not have penises.

When asked by the interviewer if he would assign a different number to the statistic of women not having penises, Sunak laughingly said that he had a “slightly different point of view to him on this”.

The interviewer asked: “Do you think it’s 100%?”

Sunak replied: “Yeah, of course.”

He went on to state that compassion and understanding are important in matters of gender, but that the issue of biological sex is critical when it comes to protecting women’s rights and spaces.

Sunak’s comments come at a time when the British government is reviewing gender laws and considering making a distinction in equality legislation between individuals who were born a certain sex and those who have undergone a sex change.

Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch is currently examining an amendment to the 2010 Equality Act that would redefine “sex” as referring to biological sex.

This modification would legalise the exclusion of transgender people from single-sex spaces in hospital wards.

The UK’s Equality Act currently allows transgender individuals to be restricted from single-sex areas such as changing rooms and shelters.

Sunak stated in the interview that the government is seeking guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission on the proposed change.

Sunak reiterated that biological sex is a vital factor to consider in issues such as women’s health, sports, and spaces.

He emphasised the need to protect the rights of women and their spaces, which is why it is essential to consider biological sex in these matters.

Sunak’s comments have sparked debate about the intersection of gender and biological sex, and the implications for policies aimed at protecting women’s rights and spaces.

While some have applauded Sunak’s statement for affirming the importance of biological sex, others have claimed it was transphobic.

Transgender activists argue that focusing on biological sex erases the experiences of transgender individuals and reinforces harmful stereotypes.

They argue that transgender individuals should have access to the same rights and spaces as cisgender individuals.

In response to Sunak’s comments, Sir Keir stated that he believes in being inclusive of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.

He affirmed the importance of respecting everyone’s human rights and ensuring that everyone has access to the same opportunities and spaces.

Starmer’s statement reflects a growing sentiment among some politicians and activists that gender should be more inclusive and less focused on biological sex.

The debate highlights the need for more inclusive policies that respect the rights and spaces of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.

Ilsa is a digital marketeer and journalist. Her interests include politics, literature, religion and football. Her motto is “Give people their flowers whilst they’re still around to smell them.”

What's New



  • Polls

    Which Bhangra Collaboration is the Best?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Share to...