Capturing their faces was inappropriate
The preservation of family history and heritage holds a deep significance in Pakistan and Pakistani women.
Families often serve as the guardians of a collective identity, passing down stories that connect generations.
This rich tapestry of memories, values, and customs not only ties individuals to their roots but also shapes the broader cultural landscape.
However, within the depths of these ancestral tales, a noticeable pattern comes to light – the systematic erasure of Pakistani women from family records.
This tradition, firmly rooted in societal norms, significantly influences how women are portrayed in historical stories.
According to a blog post by Nadiya Najib:
“One of the biggest shocks of my life was that women didn’t exist in Desi family trees.
“This is exactly why (even today), some Desi men don’t acknowledge women.
“These primitive men need to understand that they wouldn’t exist if there were no women in this world.”
This deliberate exclusion of women from family records echoes the sentiment that women’s contributions have been systematically disregarded for generations.
The intentional or unintentional neglect of female contributions confuses us and gives a biased understanding of cultural heritage.
By delving into historical documentation, cultural norms, and oral traditions, we aim to uncover the underlying reasons for this gendered bias.
Beyond mere documentation, the research seeks to explore how this gender inequality affects women’s stories, cultural narratives, and the legitimacy of recorded family legacy.
Understanding these dynamics is important not only for historical accuracy but also for promoting a more inclusive and fair representation of the diverse Pakistani heritage.
In navigating the complexities of this issue, we will analyse the role of cultural norms in shaping family histories, the impact on women’s identities, and pathways for development.
By shedding light on these overlooked aspects, we aim to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of Pakistani family legacies and their significance for broader public perspectives.
Challenges of Oral History

Oral histories have become the main method of preserving women’s stories due to the historical lack of thorough written records about their lives.
While oral traditions are invaluable, they are also subject to potential inaccuracies, omissions, and revisions over time.
The authenticity of narratives is challenged when reliance is placed on memory instead of written documentation.
These can fall under the following four factors:
Intergenerational Transmission
Oral histories are frequently passed down from one generation to the next, and details may become distorted or unclear as time passes.
This intergenerational transmission increases the possibility of errors, particularly when the stories are retold over several decades or centuries.
Selective Memory
Choosing and recalling specific past events or details is fundamentally subjective.
Oral histories tend to highlight certain aspects of women’s lives over others, resulting in an incomplete or biased representation.
Cultural and Societal Shifts
The context in which oral histories are shared can change over time as societal norms and cultures change.
These changes may have an impact on how women’s contributions and roles are portrayed, potentially altering the stories.
Interpretation and Recollection
When recording women’s stories through personal memories, interpretation and recollection are essential aspects to consider.
Different storytellers may highlight different aspects of a woman’s life or interpret events in various ways.
Certain events or experiences may be left out of oral histories, resulting in discrepancies between their accounts.
These narrative gaps may be the result of personal discomfort, cultural taboos, or a lack of understanding about women’s roles and contributions.
Legal and Cultural Implications

The erasure of Pakistani women from family histories is far more than just a historical remnant; it comes with legal and cultural consequences.
Women’s exclusion from family records can have an impact on their inheritance rights and claims to family assets in some cases.
In specific Pakistani communities, affluent families, frequently landowners, historically employed lower caste individuals and compensated them for documenting information.
However, their predominant focus was on tracing and recording the male lineage.
Women, viewed as insignificant or unimportant, were excluded from these records.
Consequently, women were erased from family histories, and their names and roles were omitted from these documents.
Despite this erasure, occasional traces of women’s existence can be found in land records.
These records, however rare, serve as crucial evidence demonstrating the allocation of land to women or validating their existence.
The task of locating these records is often challenging, as they are typically buried deep within historical archives or have been lost or damaged over time.
The retrieval of these land records becomes key in piecing together women’s ancestral histories.
Not only do these records validate their existence, but they also emphasise their substantial contributions, especially in the context of property ownership.
Nevertheless, the challenges persist in finding and accessing these vital records due to their obscurity within historical archives or their loss and deterioration over the years.
The rarity of these discoveries highlights the difficulties in determining the identities and roles of women in the distant past.
As a result, these records provide insights into the lives of Pakistani women whose names are essentially lost.
They emphasise the importance of making a concerted effort to piece together the stories of women whose histories have been overlooked in family trees.
Significance of Crosses

In traditional family trees within certain Pakistani communities, a significant omission of women’s names was symbolised by marking crosses under male names.
These crosses not only represented the absence of male heirs but also highlighted the broader issue of neglecting women’s roles within familial lineages.
The use of lower-caste individuals for record-keeping reinforced the belief, especially among older generations, that excluding women from genealogical records was normative for centuries.
The crosses under male names contributed to the ambiguity surrounding the significance of women within these ancestral lineages.
Over time, this practice became deeply integrated into the mindset of how family histories should be preserved.
These markings were commonly seen in historical records.
Typically, these records were handwritten and maintained within families for generations.
However, it’s important to note that in contemporary times, especially in countries like the UK, modern record-keeping practices have shifted significantly.
Women are now equally included and maintained in genealogical records, departing from the historical exclusionary practices that marginalised them before.
But, in the ancestral records, the presence of a cross can indicate a few possibilities:
Exclusively Daughters
One interpretation is that the individual had only daughters, which led to the apparent extinction of the family line due to the absence of male heirs.
Marriage Without Offspring
The cross could signify that the individual did get married but, for various reasons, did not have children.
This interpretation, however, leaves behind a veil of uncertainty regarding the nature of the union.
Remaining Unmarried
It might reflect that the person never married, thus leading to the discontinuation of the family line.
This scenario further complicates the understanding of an individual’s life and choices.
Early Male Offspring Deaths
The cross may also represent the tragic loss of male offspring at any age, from infancy to adulthood, without heirs to continue the lineage.
This detail highlights the fragility of family histories and the potential impact of premature deaths.
The ambiguity of these crosses highlights the complexities and challenges of researching family history within specific cultural and community contexts.
Because detailed records, such as dates of birth, marriage, and death, are scarce, a thorough and meticulous approach to research is required.
Reconstructing mother-centred history becomes critical to bring these marginalised voices to the forefront.
Photographic Taboos & Purdah

In many cases, taking pictures or photographs was perceived as immoral or taboo for Pakistani women.
As a result, we find ourselves with abundant photographs of our great-grandfathers.
While our great-grandmothers’ pictures are scarce, and if available, they often depict them in old age rather than in their youth.
In Najib’s poignant observation, she explains:
“This is the first time I saw family trees where women don’t exist at all.
“Men produce men and have only brothers.”
It reflects the broader issue of women’s erasure from historical records, including visual documentation, showcasing the prevalent disparity in photographic representation between genders.
A significant aspect that influenced the documentation and representation of women in family trees is ‘purdah’.
Purdah, a term signifying the practice of veiling or secluding women, held deep cultural significance in many Pakistani communities.
Women adhered to this practice, which often meant they wouldn’t show their faces in public or photographs.
Purdah contributed to the limited visibility of women in historical records, not only in family trees but in society at large.
Photographing women in a society where purdah was prevalent presented unique challenges – capturing their faces was inappropriate.
Thus, photographs often depicted women in traditional clothing, with veils covering their faces, making it difficult to identify them.
Sometimes, these images served as the only visual records of women in family history.
The reluctance of many women to be photographed was deeply rooted in cultural conditioning.
They were often conditioned to believe that being photographed was improper or even against the norms of purdah.
In contrast, men faced no such cultural restrictions when it came to being photographed.
Their images were freely captured throughout their lives, from youth to old age.
This disparity in photographic documentation perpetuated the uneven representation of genders in family trees.
Women usually had pictures taken late in life or after they passed away, while men enjoyed a visual narrative that spanned their entire lifetimes.
Furthermore, historical factors played a significant role in the underrepresentation of women in family trees.
In many cases, women in these communities married at a young age and had limited access to formal education.
Their lives were predominantly dedicated to the roles of motherhood and childbearing, which, while crucial, were not always documented.
Their societal roles often left them with minimal occupational history.
In the unfortunate event that a husband passed away at a young age, Pakistani women were rarely encouraged to remarry, especially if they had children.
The intersection of early marriages, limited access to education, and societal roles that primarily emphasised motherhood contributed to the historical sidelining of women in family trees.
It was not merely a matter of omission but a reflection of Pakistani society.
Where women’s roles, although invaluable, were often not acknowledged in the same manner as their male counterparts.
Evolving Traditions & Changing Family Narratives

Intriguingly, photographs of women, when they did exist, were often reserved for reverent occasions: funerals.
It was not uncommon for the only images of women to be taken when they were already deceased.
This unusual practice arose from the necessity to send photographs of the deceased to their sons who were residing abroad and unable to attend the funerals.
The contrast between the treatment of male and female ancestors reflects traditional gender roles and expectations.
The practice of capturing images of deceased women is a stark example of the evolving dynamics within these families.
Fathers, even when absent from important family events like weddings, rarely requested photographs of the occasions.
This was deemed unconventional and not in line with traditional values.
However, when it came to the photographs of women in their passing, a different sentiment succeeded.
It was considered not just acceptable but necessary to document the final moments of a woman’s life for her absent sons.
The changing landscape of family trees for Pakistani families in the UK reveals a complex interaction between tradition, migration, and evolving values.
With the arrival of subsequent generations, born and raised in the UK, there has been a shift towards more thorough and balanced documentation.
These descendants are not only keen on recording the stories of their foremothers but are also exploring their family history through research.
This shift signifies the growing importance of preserving heritage.
In this evolving narrative of Pakistani family trees, the omission of women from the visual record is being repaired.
Shift in Gender Roles

Over the years, there has been a remarkable shift in gender roles, particularly for women born in the UK.
The traditional expectation of early marriage, once a prevalent cultural norm, has evolved significantly.
Women are no longer bound by the rush to wed at a young age.
Instead, they are increasingly encouraged to pursue higher education, careers, and independence.
The idea of a woman’s worth being solely defined by her marital status has gradually given way to a more balanced and nuanced perspective.
This shift has allowed women to explore their potential in various fields, leading to diverse life paths and the opportunity to make unique contributions to their families and society at large.
Access to Records

Access to official records, such as birth, marriage, death, census, and electoral records, has become a groundbreaking factor in documenting women’s lives, especially for those residing in the UK.
These records serve as a treasure trove of information, offering a detailed account of key life events.
The availability of these records has significantly improved the documentation of women’s stories, shedding light on their roles, experiences, and contributions.
As women’s lives become more carefully recorded through these official documents, their presence expands to encompass their entire life narratives.
These records not only provide a broader perspective on the roles women play within their families but also contribute to a more inclusive representation in genealogical research.
Generational Changes

Generational shifts within immigrant communities, particularly among those raised in the UK, have been crucial for obtaining a more equal representation of women in family trees.
Second and third generations are more likely to look into their family histories.
The instinctive need to understand their history and roots has driven these generations to document their family more thoroughly.
This shift demonstrates an increasing awareness of the importance of women’s roles in shaping their families.
The transition from a primarily patriarchal system to a more inclusive and complete one shows these generations’ progressive values and priorities.
These families are committed to keeping their cultural stories intact.
This adaptation has, in turn, led to a more comprehensive representation of women’s roles and contributions within family trees.
The stories of women, once veiled by cultural norms and historical limitations, have emerged from the shadows.
Enriching the cultural narratives of Pakistani immigrant communities and emphasising the need to capture the complete tapestry of their family histories.
Evolving Family Histories of Pakistani Immigrants

The family trees of Pakistani people who migrated to the UK in the 50s and 60s, and even earlier, have been undergoing significant transformations.
These immigrants, often part of labour migration, initially faced challenges because they arrived with limited personal records.
However, as their families settled in the UK and subsequent generations were born, a more comprehensive family history emerged.
One key factor contributing to the improved documentation of these family trees is the greater accessibility of official records.
The descendants of these early immigrants, born in the UK, are typically well-documented from birth, marriage, nationality, to death records.
The UK’s resilient system of record-keeping, including vital statistics, electoral rolls, and census data, has enabled a more thorough recording of their life events.
These records provide a rich source of information for all.
Furthermore, the changing social dynamics within Pakistani communities in the UK, as well as evolving attitudes toward family history, have also played a role in documenting family trees.
The erasure of women from family histories in Pakistani culture is a deeply ingrained practice that carries significant consequences.
By prioritising male lineages, we not only neglect the contributions of women but also perpetuate gender inequalities and reinforce traditional norms.
As we continue to trace our family histories and preserve our heritage, it is crucial to work toward a more inclusive approach.
In recognising the enduring strength of women in the face of adversity, we enrich the cultural narratives of Pakistani women and their backgrounds.
This paves the way for a more equitable and balanced understanding of our shared history.
It is important to remember that women’s lives, even those of domestic housewives, were repositories of invaluable stories, wisdom, and insights.
Their stories are a testament to the resilience of Pakistani women who thrived in the face of societal constraints and oppression.
While contemporary women have made significant strides, it is essential to acknowledge the profound legacy left by their predecessors.
The stories of these resilient women serve as a foundation upon which the women of today have built their lives.
By celebrating these stories, we honour the past, acknowledge the present, and inspire a more equitable future for all.








