Everton have grappled with on-field conduct.
In a recent study conducted by betting comparison site punters.pub, the disciplinary records of Premier League teams have been scrutinised over the last five seasons.
The research focused on the 12 teams that have maintained a consistent presence in the Premier League since the start of the 2018/19 season.
Each team was assigned an average disciplinary score per game, calculated by awarding one point for a yellow card and two points for a red card.
The findings have unveiled the teams with the highest disciplinary scores, shedding light on those notorious for cardable offences.
In a half-decade span that encapsulates the last five Premier League seasons, Manchester United has found themselves at the pinnacle of a rather undesirable leaderboard.
The club now claims the dubious distinction of holding the title for the worst disciplinary record in the entire league.
The numbers paint a stark picture of the Red Devils’ on-field conduct.
Throughout the specified duration, Manchester United players have accumulated a staggering 386 yellow cards.
Complementing these cautionary signals are 9 red cards, signifying instances where the team’s competitive zeal has perhaps over-spilled into infractions that demand a more severe response.
When these figures are distilled into a per-game metric, the gravity of Manchester United’s disciplinary standing becomes even more apparent.
Averaging a disciplinary score of 2.04 per game, the Red Devils have consistently outpaced their peers in terms of on-field transgressions.
This statistic underscores a pattern of play that has been, at times, marked by a lack of restraint.
Manchester United’s disciplinary record stands out as a discordant note, challenging the traditional narrative associated with the club.
Manchester United’s consistency in amassing disciplinary actions raises questions about the balance between intensity and control on the pitch.
Over the last five seasons, Everton have grappled with on-field conduct, accumulating a significant tally of yellow and red cards that paints a vivid picture of their competitive journey.
The numerical narrative unfolds with Everton players being brandished with 367 yellow cards.
Beyond the cautionary signals, there is a more severe note struck, resonating with 17 red cards.
When these figures are distilled into a per-game context, the gravity of Everton’s disciplinary standing becomes crystalline.
Averaging a disciplinary score of 2.03 per game, the Toffees find themselves just behind Manchester United in this less-than-coveted ranking.
This score illuminates a persistent struggle with on-field discipline, one that extends beyond isolated incidents to become a defining feature of the team’s recent history.
The implications of this disciplinary ranking are multifaceted.
On one hand, it reflects a certain tenacity and competitiveness inherent in Everton’s approach to the game.
The willingness to push boundaries, challenge opponents, and fight for every inch on the field is evident.
However, on the other hand, the cost of this unbridled competitiveness is a collection of disciplinary actions that could potentially impact match outcomes and team dynamics.
Tottenham Hotspur finds themselves in the unenviable position of possessing the third-worst disciplinary record league-wide.
The vibrant energy of their play has at times spilled over into a realm of challenges that have landed them on the wrong side of the disciplinary ledger.
Throughout the last five seasons, Tottenham has encountered a series of yellow and red card infractions that have come to define their on-field journey.
The numerical narrative unfolds with a tale of 373 yellow cards, a signal of the fervour and intensity that Tottenham brings to the pitch.
This substantial figure is inherent in maintaining composure amidst the high stakes and fast-paced nature of top-tier football.
Adding a layer of severity to this cautionary tale are the 13 red cards that Tottenham players have accumulated.
Each red card, a stark symbol of an on-field transgression demanding immediate expulsion, underscores the fine line that the team treads between assertiveness and indiscipline.
As these figures converge into a per-game context, the gravity of Tottenham’s disciplinary challenges becomes apparent.
With an average discipline score of 2.02 per game, the London club finds themselves contending with the consequences of their aggressive style of play.
This score offers insights into the team’s struggle to strike a balance between an unwavering competitive spirit and the need for tactical restraint.
Wolverhampton Wanderers, fondly known as Wolves, find themselves confronting the tag of the fourth worst-disciplined team over the past five seasons.
Their journey on the pitch has been interwoven with challenges that manifest in the form of yellow and red cards, creating a narrative of both resilience and restraint.
The numerical tableau reveals that Wolves have been recipients of 363 yellow cards, a testament to the spirited nature with which they approach each match.
Yellow cards signify a delicate balance between assertiveness and maintaining the integrity of fair play.
In the heat of competition, Wolves’ players have exhibited a competitive zeal that has occasionally tipped into the realm of caution.
Adding a layer of severity to this disciplinary narrative are the 15 red cards that Wolves have accrued over the past five seasons.
Each red card underscores the challenges of navigating the fine line between controlled aggression and indiscipline.
When these figures are distilled into a per-game context, the complexities of Wolves’ disciplinary journey become even more apparent.
With an average discipline score of 1.98 per game, the team finds themselves contending with the consequences of their energetic and sometimes combative style of play.
This metric, which encapsulates the cumulative impact of both yellow and red cards, serves as a numerical reflection of Wolves’ struggle to balance passion with precision.
Arsenal finds themselves anchoring the narrative as the fifth-ranked team in disciplinary challenges over the past five seasons.
Renowned for their stylish and attacking brand of play, the Gunners have not been immune to the rigours of on-field battles.
The numerical reflection of Arsenal’s journey unfolds with the receipt of 342 yellow cards, a testament to the spirited and often fearless nature of their play.
Yellow cards signify a team unafraid to push boundaries in the pursuit of victory.
Arsenal’s players have displayed a commendable level of competitiveness, occasionally veering into the realm of caution amidst the heat of intense matches.
Adding a layer of gravity to this disciplinary storyline are the 17 red cards that Arsenal has garnered over the specified duration.
Each red card underscores the fine line Arsenal treads between the audacity of attacking football and the need for tactical restraint.
When these figures are distilled into a per-game context, the intricacies of Arsenal’s disciplinary challenges come into sharper focus.
With an average discipline score of 1.90 per game, the Gunners find themselves occupying the fifth spot in the league’s disciplinary rankings.
The top five contenders in this ranking have each etched their unique stories onto the canvas of Premier League history.
The cautionary notes of yellow cards and the more severe exclamations of red cards are not just statistical entries but reflections of the Premier League teams’ identities and playing styles.
Beyond the numbers, the implications of these disciplinary standings resonate with fans, pundits, and the broader footballing community.
The discourse extends to philosophical questions about the essence of the game—where the boundaries of passion and restraint intersect.
It prompts reflection on the evolution of footballing styles, the impact of disciplinary challenges on match outcomes, and the constant pursuit of excellence in the ever-evolving landscape of the Premier League.